Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies longer than 13 months in naturally-infected, captive white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Texas (preprint)

After identifying a captive herd of white-tailed deer (WTD) in central Texas with >94% seroprevalence with SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in September 2021, we worked retrospectively through archived serum samples of 21 deer and detected seroconversion of all animals between December 2020 and January 2021. We then collected prospective samples to conclude that the duration of persistence of neutralizing antibodies is at least 13 months for 19 (90.5%) of the animals, with two animals converting to seronegative after six and eight months. Antibody titers generally waned over this time frame, but three deer had a temporary 4 to 8-fold increases in PRNT titers over a month after seroconversion; anamnestic response cannot be ruled out.

High seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) at one of three captive cervid facilities in Texas (preprint)

Free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginanus) across the United States are increasingly recognized as involved in SARS-CoV-2 transmission cycles. Through a cross-sectional study of 80 deer at three captive cervid facilities in central and southern Texas, we provide evidence of 34 of 36 (94.4%) white-tailed deer at a single captive cervid facility seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 by neutralization assay (PRNT90), with endpoint titers as high as 1280. In contrast, all tested white-tailed deer and axis deer (Axis axis) at two other captive cervid facilities were seronegative, and SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in respiratory swabs from deer at any of the three facilities. These data support transmission among captive deer that cannot be explained by human contact for each infected animal, as only a subset of the seropositive does had direct human contact. The facility seroprevalence was more than double of that reported from wild deer, suggesting that the confined environment may facilitate transmission. Further exploration of captive cervids and other managed animals for their role in the epizootiology of SARS-CoV-2 is critical for understanding impacts on animal health and the potential for spillback transmission to humans or other animal taxa.

No Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 Among Flies or Cockroaches in COVID-19 Positive Households (preprint)

Background:The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which continues to cause infections and mortality worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted primarily via the respiratory route and has experimentally been found to be stable on surfaces for multiple days. Flies (Diptera) and other arthropods mechanically transmit several pathogens, including turkey coronavirus. A previous experimental study demonstrated house flies, Musca domestica, can mechanically transmit SARS-CoV-2, but the ability of flies in general to acquire and deposit this virus in natural settings has not been explored. The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of mechanical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by peridomestic insects and their potential as a xenosurveillance tool for detection of the virus.Methods:In order to optimize chances of viral detection, flies were trapped in homes where at least one confirmed human COVID-19 case(s) resided. Sticky and liquid baited fly traps were deployed inside and outside of the homes of SARS-CoV-2 human cases in Brazos, Bell, and Montgomery Counties, from June to September 2020. Flies from sticky traps were identified, pooled by taxa, homogenized, and tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using qRT-PCR. Liquid traps were drained, and the collected fluid similarly tested after RNA concentration. Experimental viral detection pipeline and viral inactivation were confirmed in a Biosafety Level 3 lab.  As part of a separate ongoing study, companion animals in the home were sampled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 on the same day of insect trap deployment.Results:We processed the contents of 133 insect traps from 44 homes, which contained over 1,345 individual insects of 11 different Diptera families and Blattodea.These individuals were grouped into 243 pools, and all tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.  Dead flies exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in a BSL3 lab were processed using the same methods and viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR. Fourteen traps in seven homes were deployed on the day that cat or dog samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by nasal, oral, body, or rectal samples.Conclusions:This study presents evidence that biting and non-biting flies are not likely to contribute to mechanical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or be useful in xenosurveillance for SARS-CoV-2.

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern detected in a pet dog and cat after exposure to a person with COVID-19, USA (preprint)

As part of a longitudinal household transmission study of pets living with persons with COVID-19 in Texas, two pets were confirmed to be infected with the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 variant of concern (VOC). The pets were a dog and a cat from the same household, sampled two days after their owner tested positive for COVID-19. The oral, nasal, and fur swabs for both pets tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by qRT-PCR and consensus whole genome sequences from the dog and cat were 100 % identical and matched the B.1.1.7 VOC. Virus was isolated from the cat’s nasal swab. One month after initial detection of infection, the pets were re-tested twice at which time only the fur swabs (both pets) and oral swab (dog only) remained positive, and neutralizing antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 were present in both animals. Sneezing by both pets was noted by the owner in the weeks between initial and follow-up testing. This study documents the first detection of B.1.1.7. in companion animals in the United States, and the first genome recovery and isolation of B.1.1.7 variant of concern globally in any animal.

Natural SARS-CoV-2 infections, including virus isolation, among serially tested cats and dogs in households with confirmed human COVID-19 cases in Texas, USA (preprint)

The natural infections and epidemiological roles of household pets in SARS-CoV-2 transmission are not understood. We conducted a longitudinal study of dogs and cats living with at least one SARS-CoV-2 infected human in Texas and found 47.1% of 17 cats and 15.3% of 59 dogs from 25.6% of 39 households were positive for SARS-CoV-2 via RT-PCR and genome sequencing or neutralizing antibodies. Virus was isolated from one cat. The majority (82.4%) of infected pets were asymptomatic. Re-sampling of one infected cat showed persistence of viral RNA at least 32 d-post human diagnosis (25 d-post initial test). Across 15 antibody-positive animals, titers increased (33.3%), decreased (33.3%) or were stable (33.3%) over time. A One Health approach is informative for prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.